First exercise of the tool against unfamiliar real-world drafts (user's
in-progress academic papers, not derived from CMOS quick guide
examples). Found three systemic patterns affecting ~14% of entries
across 134-entry and 13-entry drafts; this commit addresses all three.
Prompt additions:
27. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS / INSTITUTIONAL REPORTS — when the author is
a government body (GAO, US Census, WHO, Pew, etc.) and the source
is a standalone report, italicize the title like a book; do NOT
wrap it in quotes. CMOS 14.272.
28. PRESERVE DELIBERATE LOWERCASING of proper nouns. Examples cited in
the prompt: the journal "portal: Libraries and the Academy"
(deliberately lowercase "p"), authors bell hooks / danah boyd /
e e cummings, brand names iPhone / eBay. Headline-case
normalization must NOT touch these.
Rule 17 also extended (was newspaper/magazine only):
17. PERIODICAL NAMES — drop leading "The" from ANY periodical:
newspapers, magazines, AND scholarly journals. Write "Journal of
Academic Librarianship", not "The Journal of Academic
Librarianship"; "Library Quarterly", not "The Library Quarterly";
"American Archivist", not "The American Archivist". CMOS 14.191.
Rule explicitly excepts BOOK titles and report titles, which keep
their leading "The" (e.g., *The Library's Guide to Sexual and
Reproductive Health Information*).
Empirical impact, Reading_Disrepair (13 entries):
before: 3 errors (2 leading-The, 1 GAO format, 1 portal capitalized)
after: 0 errors
Empirical impact, HML Submission (134 entries):
before: ~21 errors (18 leading-The, 0 GAO in this draft, 3 portal)
after: ~1 error (a multi-author 2nd-author inversion bug newly
surfaced — separate fix)
Also adds scripts/analyze_draft_output.py — a triage helper that
diff-walks input and output, surfacing common failure patterns
(leading-The, doi: prefix, bare-hyphen ranges, gov-report quoted, and
intentional lowercasing stripped). False positives are tolerated since
it's a human-review tool, not a validator.
Exemplar corpus is unchanged. Re-baseline against 14 canary exemplars
under the new rules: scalar 1.000, canary 1.000 (no regressions).
User's real drafts under rough_drafts/ remain untracked — they are
in-progress academic work and don't belong in git history.
